Ministers are allowed to conduct weddings as legal officiators so long as they have the proper license(for a minister getting a license “must produce proof of her/his ordination and regular communion with the religious society of which s/he is a reputed member”). It would be possible for her to be ordained and given permission to preform it under the name of a church but that’s the thing. Finding a church willing to put it’s name out there is difficult. Finally, temporary licenses must be done in person, and involves questioning (though some of this is county based, but most of them are generally the same- just different ways of doing the same thing). A congregating religious group needs to have a legal citizen as a minister to have the right to marry people. The next one will be the last one and should finish filling people in on the issue, and identify the possible solutions. So anyways, it’s not complete BS, its manipulation of the law.
Truth! This isn’t a “You shall not pass,” it’s a “luck of the draw” sort of thing. Does Naoko get an jerk/anti-chimera bigot as her reviewer, or not…
Now, to some extent, the location of the issuing court could help…
Holy shit he replyd to my comment.
Why do they need a church to permitit?
Sorry for bad english.
It’s not bad English it’s poor English, bad English has lots of profanity!
Because marriage is a privilege not a right? Banning chimera+human (opposite gender) marriage is stupid because the purpose of marriage is to create and train children to be productive members of society. Phil and Kate have shown themselves productive citizens in good standing. (For the sake of the story, I’ll suppose that Phil and Kate can have children.) “Same sex” marriage can NOT work because 1.) Monogamous homosexuals can NOT produce children. 2.) The longest committed homosexual union ON RECORD is 5 years. Properly training a child to become a productive citizen takes at least a decade, maybe two or more. It has been shown, repeatedly, that children from broken homes, regardless of the reason, do poorly compared to their counterparts from intact homes all other factors being equal. Speaking of children, be very wary of the “gay rights” movement. Some (especially in the leadership) are seeking to extend the “rights to an alternate lifestyle” they win on the “gay” front to ignore such things as age restrictions.
How’s SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE for that bible belt ideology and its easy to manipulate stats to be to a specific area. And the age restrictions is only one branch of it. There have always been two reasons and only 2 reasons really why people get married in the long run Love and Power the power portion now days extends to the declension to keep the spouse that is next to dead on life support or allow for organ donation and save a few lives as well as shared ownership, if the reason for marriage was children we would have a few billion fewer people in the world. In fact that 5 years thing is actually the longest one that has ENDED.
Oh one last thing….
Most of all recreational drugs in their prime (60s and 70s) were used by kids with “White Picket” parents. Conformity DEGRADES society.
I’m not homosexual myself but i am Anti-Intolerant and pro First Amendment, Pro Full-Picture and Anti-Propaganda.
I firmly believe any intolerance is anti-American in our founding ideals.
However i must state that i am also pro-voice and i will quote Voltaire “I may disagree with what you say but i will defend to the death your right to say it” with the amendment: as long as it isn’t restricting the voice of others.
Why does sage keep replying to my comments?
Also I don’t call bullshit upon the laws surrounding marriage but rather marriage it self I don’t see why anybody needs someone to tell them they love etchoter.
Because you’re giving me things to reply to? XD
Marriage is not about having someone tell people they love each other. It’s a custom that has a legal influence/connection. A married couple has several rights that friends/partners that aren’t married don’t have and cannot have. There’s also filing taxes as a couple which can give some tax breaks.
This is actually part of why I’m sort of in favor of Civil unions replacing “marriage” as the legal consideration – ie, you and your partner are “unioned” when you get the license (which can’t be denied except under certain rational reasons [under-aged and the like]), and the marriage is strictly a religious affair that a separate organizational body can give or withhold as their conscience sees fit, without legal repercussions. Separation of Church and State, to me, argues that if you have a conflict between the two because their stepping on each others toes, then it behooves both to separate further, instead of getting into a shoving match over the same ground.
Well put.
George Takei and Brad Been have been together for over 20 years and are still together. Homosexual parents are able to care for adopted children that desperately need a home and are able to raise them to be productive members of a society.
How do you handle intolerant bible belt morons so well? I need to know cause I really don’t stand intolerance (i know slightly hypocritical as i don’t tolerate intolerant people).
I’m a Christian myself, I just have a few differences in opinion. Like most real Christians I believe in science and understanding. A lot of things in the bible are interpreted and all of it was written in an ancient language translated over and over. I accept the fact that some things could have made it in that were human opinion and not “the word of God”. So i take from it what makes sense. The true message is loving your neighbors and trying to make the best of your life without hurting others. Belief in a religion doesn’t mean you have to be ignorant of everything else.
You are awesome and correct Sage.
…My respect for you just increased a hundred fold.
Of those given the right to Officiate a wedding, there are certain government officials granted this right as part of their job. Besides them, ministers have this right appointed to them through their organization and it’s very easy for a religious organization to get their license or be ordained to preform as an officiator.
They don’t need a Church, but its one of many ways to have a wedding officiated. A friend or family member can preform the ceremony, and the minister just has to step in for the last bit for it to be considered a legal ceremony. Or the minister could help ordain or help grant the person the right to do so. If they did it through a church or other religious organization, they is no questioning process or anything like that. It just has to be a legal union (for example, they have to be over 18, not be siblings, and still in many states, not be the same gender).
well this is awkward.
on another note I call bullshit upon this